Drive consistent, defensible contract decisions
Apply legal-approved standards, reduce risk exposure, and accelerate decisions with AI that works under Legal’s control.
The Solution
Legal teams driving contract standards and risk oversight
How Icertis helps Legal
AI Redlining and Negotiation
Apply legal-approved playbooks automatically across incoming paper, propose fallback language, and route only true exceptions to a lawyer. Outcome: Cuts first-pass review time from hours to minutes.
Clause and Template Self-Service
Let business teams generate standard agreements (NDAs, simple SOWs) from a governed clause library without opening a legal ticket. Outcome: Removes Legal from roughly 60% of routine requests.
Risk and Obligation Tracking
Surface non-standard terms, missed obligations, and renewal exposure across the executed portfolio. Outcome: Full post-signature visibility, no manual audit required.
No. AI applies legal-defined standards, while Legal retains full authority over approvals, exceptions, and final decisions.
Legal defines playbooks, clauses, and risk thresholds that guide every contract and govern how decisions are made.
No. Controls, approvals, and policy enforcement ensure that every contract complies with defined legal standards.
Deviations are identified during drafting and negotiation, with guided responses aligned to legal-approved positions.
Yes. Obligations are identified early and tracked with ownership, deadlines, and visibility into compliance.
Risk signals are surfaced across contracts, clauses, and counterparties for early visibility into exposure.
Analytics provide insight into risk trends, deviations, obligations, and contract performance.