After a period of recalibration, M&A activity is expected to remain strong through 2026, driven by a combination of pent-up demand, private equity dry powder and strategic consolidation. While dealmaking conditions continue to vary by sector and geography, many organizations are moving forward with acquisitions not just to grow, but to reshape capabilities, portfolios, and operating models.
Against this backdrop, execution risk has become as important as deal strategy itself. Leaders are increasingly focused on whether their organizations can integrate quickly, realize value sooner, and avoid the operational drag that often follows closing.
Recently, we sat down with Scott Curtis, Managing Director at Deloitte, to discuss how M&A execution is evolving—and what differentiates organizations that consistently extract value from those that struggle post-close.
One of the clearest shifts Curtis highlighted is the growing emphasis on pre-close readiness. As deals become more complex, value creation depends less on the transaction itself and more on how prepared organizations are to absorb change.
“The organizations that do this well are thinking beyond the transaction,” Curtis noted. “They’re asking what this deal actually means for how the business operates on day one—and day one hundred.”
This mindset reframes M&A as a transformation initiative rather than a discrete financial event. Integration planning, data visibility, and cross-functional alignment are no longer post-deal activities—they’re prerequisites.
Another recurring challenge in M&A is underestimating the role of commercial agreements. Contracts often sit at the intersection of revenue, cost, risk, and operational flexibility, yet they’re frequently reviewed only at a surface level during diligence.
Curtis emphasized that contracts should be examined not just for compliance or red flags, but for what they enable—or restrict—once the deal is done.
“When you look closely at contracts, you start to see where the organization has leverage, where it has exposure, and where assumptions may not hold after integration.”
This deeper view can surface issues that materially affect deal economics, integration timelines, or strategic intent—long before they become operational surprises.
As M&A timelines compress and expectations rise, organizations can no longer rely on ad hoc processes or institutional knowledge to carry integrations forward. Curtis pointed to the growing importance of repeatable execution models—supported by systems that provide visibility and coordination across teams.
“The goal isn’t to relearn how to integrate with every deal,” Curtis said. “It’s to build the capability to do it consistently.”
This includes having clarity around data, contracts, and obligations from the outset, so teams can move quickly without sacrificing control.
As deal activity continues into 2026, the organizations that outperform will be those that treat M&A as an operational discipline, not just a strategic ambition. That means investing in readiness, surfacing insight early, and ensuring the infrastructure exists to translate deal rationale into real results.
In a market where speed and certainty increasingly define success, execution is no longer the final chapter of M&A—it’s the throughline.
Talk with our contract value experts about building the execution, contract visibility, and operational readiness needed to realize value faster from your deals.
EBOOK
Discover why M&A deals fall short and the critical role of contracts in realizing deal synergies and mitigating post-close risk.
Transforming contracts into structured, connected, and on-demand data is just the beginning. Discover the power of intelligent contract creation, automation, and insights to realize the full intent and maximize the value of every contract, clause, and obligation across the enterprise.