Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) protects the confidentiality commitments contracts are built to keep for years, sometimes decades, after signing.
Organizations must now plan the transition of affected systems.
Systems must swap algorithms without disrupting operations.
PQC requirements are starting to appear inside contracts themselves.
As PQC requirements start appearing in supplier agreements, contract intelligence can surface existing provisions on security upgrades, standards changes, and audit rights across your portfolio, not just ours.
Migration dates, testing milestones, and remediation commitments don't stop mattering once a contract is signed. They can be tracked as obligations, the same way any other commitment is.
When an agreement lacks adequate PQC coverage, that's not just a compliance flag. It can become an amendment, a negotiation, and a tracked exception, not a problem that sits unresolved.
Not yet, and neither is most of the industry. Data is protected today with AES-256 and TLS 1.2/1.3, and we actively track NIST's PQC standards.
Inventory and readiness work runs through 2026, followed by hybrid PQC adoption as cloud platforms mature, then broader PQC-based certificates and signatures over time.
Yes. PQC clause intelligence surfaces existing provisions on security upgrades, standards changes, and supplier cooperation across your contract portfolio.
Vera Oblilgations tracks migration dates, testing milestones, and remediation commitments so nothing is missed once a contract is signed.
Remediation campaigns help identify affected agreements, initiate amendments, manage negotiations, and report residual exposure across the portfolio.
No. Symmetric encryption like AES-256, used for most stored data, already meets NIST guidance.
Base security protections apply automatically. Capability adoption, like clause intelligence or remediation campaigns, is configured to your existing contract policies.
