An arbitration agreement is designed to resolve disputes through a third party rather than traditional court litigation. These agreements specify how conflicts will be handled, who will serve as arbitrators, and what rules will govern the process.
An arbitration agreement is a contract in which two or more parties agree to resolve disputes through a private arbitration process instead of pursuing litigation in court. In arbitration, a neutral person (the arbitrator) decides the case instead of a judge or jury. It’s usually faster, private, and less formal.
Arbitration is a dispute resolution method where disagreeing parties present their cases to one or more neutral third parties, known as arbitrators, instead of going to court over contract compliance issues. Unlike litigation, which often involves lengthy court proceedings, public records, and rigid procedural rules, arbitration offers a more flexible and private approach to conflict resolution.
In arbitration, the appointed arbitrator or panel listens to evidence and arguments from both sides before deciding to resolve the dispute. This process typically moves more quickly than court proceedings and follows less formal rules. The arbitrator's decision, called an "award," is usually final and binding on all parties involved, meaning it can't be easily appealed or overturned.
Read on to learn the key elements of this agreement, the different types, its advantages and disadvantages, and how to create one.
An arbitration agreement should contain several critical components that define how disputes will be handled and resolved. Here are the key elements you'll find in any arbitration agreement example. Use them to help you craft an effective and enforceable mutual arbitration agreement:
The core of any arbitration agreement is the explicit commitment from all parties to resolve specified disputes through arbitration rather than litigation. This section clearly states that the parties waive their right to bring covered disputes to court, including jury trials, and agree to submit them to arbitration instead.
The language must be clear and unambiguous to ensure mutual consent and prevent enforceability challenges later.
This element defines which types of disagreements fall under the arbitration process. Some agreements broadly cover "all disputes arising from or related to" the underlying contract, while others specifically state covered disputes or exclude certain matters.
This section should be carefully drafted to avoid ambiguity about which conflicts require arbitration and which might still be litigated.
The agreement outlines how arbitrators will be chosen, whether by mutual agreement, from a specific organization's roster, or through another method. It may specify the number of arbitrators, required qualifications, subject matter expertise, or standards of neutrality.
This section establishes the procedural framework that will govern the arbitration process. It often references established rules from organizations like the American Arbitration Association (AAA), Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. (JAMS), or the International Chamber of Commerce.
These rules cover everything from initial filings and arbitrator selection to evidence presentation, hearing procedures, timelines, and award issuance. The agreement might also include modifications to standard rules to fit the parties' specific needs.
The agreement specifies where the arbitration proceedings will take place. This could be a physical or virtual location. The venue choice affects convenience, cost, and which laws apply to certain procedural questions.
For international agreements, venue selection is crucial because of varying enforcement standards across countries.
This element addresses how arbitration expenses will be shared or allocated between parties. Costs typically include arbitrator fees, administrative expenses, hearing facility charges, and attorney fees, if applicable.
The agreement might require that costs be shared equally, allocated to the losing party, or handled through an alternative arrangement. Cost provisions can impact access to the arbitration process, especially for parties with limited resources.
Many arbitration agreements include provisions maintaining the privacy of proceedings and outcomes. Unlike court cases, which create public records, arbitration can offer confidentiality for sensitive business information, trade secrets, personal data, or reputational concerns.
The agreement specifies what information must be kept confidential, who is bound by the confidentiality, and the potential consequences for breaching the contract.
For clarity and proper interpretation, agreements specify the official language for proceedings and which jurisdiction's laws govern the arbitration agreement and the underlying dispute.
Understanding the governing law prevents misunderstandings and establishes a clear legal framework for addressing contractual interpretation questions or procedural issues that are not explicitly covered in the agreement.
This section confirms that arbitration decisions are legally binding and enforceable. It often references applicable laws, such as the Federal Arbitration Act or the New York Convention, which provide for the judicial enforcement of arbitration awards.
This element establishes the authority of the arbitration process and clarifies that parties must comply with the arbitrator's final decision.
Arbitration agreements are used for various purposes in business and legal settings. By establishing a predetermined dispute resolution mechanism, parties can avoid the uncertainty, publicity, and often higher costs associated with traditional litigation.
The agreements are essential for ongoing commercial relationships where quick and efficient dispute resolution helps maintain business continuity. Industries with complex technical issues often prefer arbitration because it allows for arbitrators with specialized knowledge rather than generalist judges or juries.
Arbitration agreements are standard in various types of contracts, including employment contracts, consumer purchase agreements, healthcare service agreements, and international business transactions. Many businesses include arbitration clauses to streamline dispute resolution across all their operations.
Arbitration agreements come in several forms, each of which you should know if you plan on using them in your business.
Most arbitration agreements are binding, so the arbitrator's decision is final and enforceable. Non-binding arbitration, where parties can reject the outcome and opt for litigation, is more of a structured contract negotiation
Mandatory arbitration requires parties to use arbitration for covered disputes, whereas voluntary agreements offer arbitration as an option that parties can choose after a dispute has occurred.
Most arbitration agreements are made before any dispute arises (pre-dispute), typically within the original contract. Less commonly, parties may agree to arbitrate after a dispute emerges (post-dispute agreement).
Administered arbitration follows the rules and procedures established by institutions like the AAA, while ad hoc arbitration operates under procedures specifically created for that dispute, without institutional oversight.
The type of arbitration agreement significantly impacts how disputes are resolved and the parties' legal rights.

Arbitration agreements offer several benefits compared to traditional litigation, including:
Despite their clear benefits, arbitration agreements have potential drawbacks that businesses should consider, such as:
Arbitration agreements appear in various contexts, including both business and consumer relationships. A few common use cases include:
Employers often include arbitration clauses that cover workplace disputes, discrimination claims, or termination issues. These agreements have become increasingly common across industries and job levels.
Arbitration provisions often appear in terms of service for products, credit cards, banking services, and online platforms. Consumers often accept these agreements when making purchases or using services.
Business-to-business arrangements typically include arbitration clauses for handling disputes related to performance, payment, quality issues, or contract interpretation.
Due to the technical nature and potential for disputes in construction projects, arbitration agreements are often included in contracts between property owners, contractors, and subcontractors.
Many healthcare providers incorporate arbitration provisions in patient agreements to address potential malpractice or service quality disputes.
Cross-border commercial relationships commonly use arbitration agreements to avoid navigating multiple court systems and to ensure consistent dispute resolution procedures.
In all of these cases, proper contract lifecycle management ensures that arbitration agreements are properly drafted, reviewed, approved, and monitored throughout their entire lifespan, helping businesses maintain control over their dispute resolution processes while minimizing legal risks.
When putting together an arbitration agreement, there are a few essential things to keep in mind:
The Icertis Contract Intelligence Platform helps businesses create, manage, and enforce arbitration agreements more effectively. By bringing all your agreements into one digital system, Icertis provides better visibility and control over how you handle disputes, while ensuring compliance with changing laws and regulations. Our contract management software eliminates the headaches of tracking paper documents and spreadsheets, putting everything you need at your fingertips.
Icertis offers smart features like standardized clauses, risk alerts, and obligation tracking, which help legal teams maintain consistent arbitration provisions across the company. With our contract intelligence platform, businesses reduce the likelihood of entering into unenforceable agreements and resolve conflicts more smoothly when they do arise.
A contract provision where parties agree to resolve disputes through private arbitration instead of litigation.
Arbitration offers confidentiality, streamlined procedures, and potentially faster resolutions to the case without the formality of a courtroom.
Yes. Arbitration reduces procedural delays and allows for faster decisions that can lower total costs.
Yes. It is often applied to disputes tied to events during the business relationship.
Yes, the outcome is generally binding, with minimal grounds for appeal.
Only in rare cases involving fraud, bias, or serious procedural errors.
For more than 20 years, World Commerce & Contracting has surveyed commercial contract practitioners about the terms they focus on most when negotiating contracts, and strategies for improving contract outcomes. Download the report to see the most negotiated terms of 2024.
Based on the input of 374 organizations, this year’s AI in Contracting report reveals that 42% of organizations are currently implementing AI in their contracting process. Participants are calling AI adoption "not optional" but "essential" to staying competitive. Access the report today to learn more.