A cost-plus contract is an agreement where the client agrees to cover the costs of the project or service, plus an additional fee for the service provider’s overhead and profit. This type of contract is commonly used when the scope of work is not clearly defined from the outset, or when it's difficult to estimate the exact costs of the project.
When embarking on a complex project or service engagement, selecting the right type of contract significantly contributes to the project's overall success. One contract type offering flexibility on costs when the total is unknown is the cost-plus contract. It is commonly used in government projects, construction, and even consulting services. In this article, we’ll explore what a cost-plus contract is, how it works, its advantages and drawbacks, and when it’s typically used.
A cost-plus contract, also known as a cost-reimbursement contract, is an agreement where the client pays the service provider for their actual expenses incurred in completing the project, along with an additional fee to cover overhead and profit. The service provider is reimbursed for direct expenses, including labor, materials, and other associated costs, and receives an agreed-upon percentage or a fixed fee for their services.
Cost-plus contracts are often used for projects where the scope of work is uncertain or subject to change. They can also be used for projects that are complex or require specialized expertise.
A cost-plus contract has several distinct features that make it suitable for projects with uncertain or evolving scopes. They are defined by their flexibility, cost reimbursement structure, contractor fee provisions, and emphasis on transparency and collaboration. Here are the key features of a cost-plus contract in more detail:
The number one hallmark of a cost-plus contract is where the client reimburses the service provider for all allowable costs incurred during the project.
A cost-plus contract typically comes with a term outlining the fee structure. The service provider receives a fee in addition to the reimbursed costs. The fee can be fixed, a percentage of costs, or based on performance.
The cost-plus contracts are often used when the project scope is uncertain or subject to change. This type of agreement grants the contracting parties flexibility on the project scope and price as project requirements or market conditions evolve.
In a cost-plus agreement, the client and service provider share the risk of cost overruns or unforeseen challenges to the project.
Without proper cost control, cost-plus contracts can lead to higher than expected costs. See the next section on fee structures for insights on how some organizations may choose to mitigate the issue.
Cost-plus contracts, while offering flexibility, typically include specific terms to outline the contractual relationship between the parties. It contains several terms that outline the responsibilities, payments, and expectations of the service provider and the client. These terms define how costs will be managed, how the service provider will be compensated, and how the project will be executed. Here are some common terms:
Although cost-plus contracts are often used when the exact scope of work is not fully defined, a general description of the project and desired outcomes must be included. This section details the overall objectives, deliverables, and any specific milestones the service provider must meet. The scope may also include any known constraints, expected quality standards, and the roles of each party involved.
Direct Costs: These are costs that are directly attributable to the project. Examples include labor, materials, and equipment used specifically for the project.
Indirect Costs (Overhead): These are general operating costs that are not directly tied to a specific part of the project but are necessary to the service provider’s operations, such as administrative expenses, office space, or utilities.
Other Allowable Costs: The contract may specify other costs that can be reimbursed, such as travel expenses, subservice provider fees, or equipment rentals.
Cost Reimbursement: The client agrees to reimburse the service provider for actual costs incurred during the project, based on documented expenses. The service provider is required to submit detailed invoices and receipts for these costs.
Audit Rights: Many cost-plus contracts include provisions for the client to audit the service provider’s records and verify the costs. This ensures transparency and safeguards the client against inflated expenses or mismanagement.
Fixed Fee: The service provider receives a predetermined fee, which remains constant regardless of the final project costs. This provides some financial certainty for both parties.
Percentage Fee: In some cases, the service provider’s fee is a percentage of the total project costs. This can incentivize service providers to increase the overall cost, so these contracts are less common or come with oversight mechanisms.
Incentive Fee: The service provider may be eligible for an additional incentive fee based on certain performance criteria, such as completing the project ahead of schedule or under budget. To mitigate the potential for cost overruns, some organizations use incentive fees for the service provider to perform efficiently. For example, a Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure offers a bonus for meeting or exceeding project goals, such as completing the work under budget or ahead of schedule.
Award Fee: In this variation, the service provider can earn an award fee based on subjective evaluation criteria related to performance, quality, or innovation.
Progress Payments: Payments are typically made as the project progresses, based on milestones or periodic (monthly, quarterly) invoices submitted by the service provider. The service provider is reimbursed for incurred costs along with the agreed-upon fee or profit.
Retention Clause: In some contracts, the client may withhold a percentage of each payment (e.g., 10%) until the project is fully completed and accepted. This ensures that the service provider remains incentivized to finish the project satisfactorily.
This section outlines an estimated timeline for the project’s completion. This includes major deadlines, delivery of critical milestones, and any contingencies for delays. Since the project scope may change over time, the contract should include provisions for adjusting the timeline if the scope of work or costs increase unexpectedly.
This section specifies how change orders (modifications to the original scope) will be handled. This includes how changes are requested, evaluated, and authorized. Change orders often lead to cost adjustments and timelines, so a well-defined process ensures that both parties agree to changes in advance.
The service provider’s duties include overseeing the project’s execution, hiring subservice providers if necessary, procuring materials, and ensuring the work complies with industry standards and regulations.
Quality Control: The contract may include requirements for quality assurance, specifying performance standards or benchmarks that the service provider must meet.
Risk Management: The service provider may be required to implement risk management practices to mitigate unforeseen challenges, such as delays, cost overruns, or safety issues.
Timely Payments: The client is responsible for making payments to the service provider according to the terms agreed upon in the contract. Payment delays could result in project delays.
Approvals and Decisions: The client may need to provide timely decisions, approvals, or clarifications regarding changes to the project. A delay in providing necessary input may impact the project timeline or costs.
The section outlines conditions under which either party can terminate the agreement, including termination for convenience (by the client without specific cause) or termination for default (due to failure to meet contractual obligations by either party).
This section will also specify how outstanding costs will be handled in the event of early termination, including compensation for work already performed and materials already purchased.
This section details how disputes between the service provider and the client will be resolved, such as through mediation, arbitration, or litigation. Some contracts may specify that disputes must be settled out of court.
The section typically outlines the service provider’s insurance requirements, such as liability coverage for accidents or damages during the project. This ensures that the service provider is adequately insured against risks.
Limitation of Liability: It may also define the limits of liability for both parties, specifying what damages can or cannot be claimed in case of project failures, accidents, or delays.
This section clarifies the ownership rights for any intellectual property created during the project and may grant licenses for using intellectual property developed under the contract.
The section defines events beyond either party's control, such as natural disasters or acts of war, that may excuse contractual non-performance.
Remember that these are general terms; specific cost-plus contracts may include additional provisions specific to the unique project requirements and the parties involved. It is advisable to consult with your in-house legal team when drafting such an agreement.
There are several variations of cost-plus contracts. As previously mentioned, the type depends on how the service provider’s fee is determined. The four most common types are explained below. Consult with your in-house legal team about the contract that best fits your project.
In this arrangement, the service provider is reimbursed for all project costs plus a fixed fee, regardless of the project’s final cost. This fee doesn’t change even if the project’s actual costs go up or down.
Under this model, the service provider's fee is calculated as a percentage of the total project costs. This method can incentivize the service provider to increase costs, so it’s used less frequently.
In this variation, the service provider is reimbursed for costs, but the final fee is adjusted based on whether the service provider meets certain performance goals (e.g., completing the project under budget or on schedule).
This structure adds an award fee that is subjectively determined based on the service provider's performance, cost reimbursement, and a fixed fee.
You may also like: See how this contract compares to the fixed price contract where the total contract value is known upfront and unlikely to change.
Cost-plus contracts are most commonly used in projects where estimating costs upfront is challenging. Here are some real-world scenarios where a cost-plus contract might be the best suited:
A cost-plus contract allows for flexibility for extensive, multi-phase construction projects where the full scope of work may not be known in advance.
Cost-plus contracts are often used in public works projects, particularly when the scope is uncertain or when the project demands high-quality results that can’t be compromised by cost-saving measures.
Defense Contracts: Due to the complexity and classified nature of many defense projects, cost-plus contracts are often used to manage risks and ensure transparency in pricing.
Research and Development: Government-funded research projects can have unpredictable outcomes. A cost-plus contract allows for adjustments in funding as the project progresses.
R&D projects frequently involve unforeseen challenges, making it difficult to define costs upfront. In medical research, clinical trials and drug development can involve unforeseen costs and delays. A cost-plus contract provides flexibility in funding.
Software Development: Developing complex software systems can involve iterative processes and evolving requirements. A cost-plus contract ensures that the client isn't penalized for changes made during development.
IT Consulting: When the exact scope of IT consulting services is unclear, a cost-plus contract provides flexibility to address unforeseen issues or additional requirements.
Cost-plus contracts come with several benefits that make them an attractive option in certain scenarios:
Cost-plus contracts can be more flexible than fixed-price contracts, as they allow for changes in the scope of work or when the cost is difficult to predict in advance.
In a cost-plus contract, the service provider takes on less financial risk compared to a fixed-price contract. Since the client covers all costs, the service provider is less likely to face losses if the project runs over budget.
Because the service provider isn’t focused on cutting costs to protect their margin, the client often has more influence over the quality of materials and craftsmanship. The service provider is incentivized to deliver the best results rather than the cheapest.
The nature of cost-plus contracts fosters a collaborative environment between the client and service provider, as both parties can collaborate to adjust project needs and costs throughout the project's progression.
There are also several disadvantages to using cost-plus contracts, most of them revolve around cost, including:
Cost-plus contracts can be more expensive than fixed-price contracts, as the service provider is reimbursed for all of their allowable costs.
Because the service provider is reimbursed for all their allowable costs, they are less incentivized to control costs.
Cost-plus contracts can be subject to cost overruns, as the service provider may have an incentive to inflate their costs.
Given the complex nature of cost-plus contracts, disputes can arise over what constitutes a reimbursable expense, especially when dealing with indirect costs or overhead.
The takeaway is that cost-plus contracts can be well-suited for projects where the scope of work is uncertain or subject to change, but they can also be more expensive and subject to cost overruns. It is essential to carefully consider the advantages and disadvantages of this type of agreement before deciding whether to use it.
Contract management software is a valuable tool for managing cost-plus contracts. It provides a centralized repository for storing all contract documents, automates workflow management, tracks and reports costs, manages change orders, improves compliance, facilitates collaboration, and enables risk management. We explore these specific benefits further:
Contract management software provides a secure, centralized location to store all contract documents, including the original agreement, associated agreements, change orders, invoices, and progress reports. Authorized stakeholders can access and view relevant contract information whenever needed, reducing the risk of misplacing or losing critical documents.
Contract management software can automate task tracking and milestones associated with cost-plus contracts. The best-in-class software platform can speed up the contract review cycles by as much as 40%. The software can send timely reminders to relevant parties about upcoming deadlines, payments, or inspections.
Contract management software can track and analyze various costs incurred throughout the project, including labor, materials, and overhead expenses. The best-in-class software can fully integrate with other enterprise systems, such as SAP, ensuring that the data is always accurate and up-to-date. The software can generate detailed cost reports, providing insights into project performance and identifying potential cost overruns or savings.
The software maintains a history of all changes made to the contract, ensuring transparency and accountability in version control. Advanced contract management software can help assess the financial impact of proposed changes, enabling informed decisions.
Contract management software creates an audit trail of all contract activities, facilitating compliance with regulatory requirements and internal policies. The software can be configured to enforce contract terms and conditions, reducing the risk of non-compliance.
Contract management software provides a shared platform for project teams to collaborate and communicate effectively, including working with third-party vendors. The software ensures all team members work with the latest contract version, minimizing misunderstandings and errors.
Contract management software can help identify potential risks associated with cost-plus contracts, such as cost overruns or schedule delays. The software can support developing and implementing risk mitigation strategies to minimize negative impacts.
By putting contract managers in the driver’s seat in workflow automation and risk management, the software enables project teams to focus on delivering project objectives while controlling costs, ensuring compliance, and effective communication.
Looking for a contract management platform that does all the above and more? Today, more than a third of the Fortune 100 trust the Icertis Contract Intelligence platform to transform the contract lifecycle management at their organizations. From automated contract analysis to risk assessment, Icertis uses AI to empower you to extract valuable insights from your contracts, reduce risks, and ensure compliance. Start your journey to better contract outcomes with Icertis Contract Intelligence. Request a demo to learn more.
Value delivered at every step of the contract lifecycle. Learn why 33% of the Fortune 100 trust Icertis to accelerate contracting across their enterprise while driving compliance and performance.
Increase win rates and improve contract performance while improving compliance with critical federal regulations with an AI-powered contract management solution integrated with acquisition.gov.